AN ALMOST PERFECT NOVEL
That’s not a Weight Watchers
commercial: it’s a line midway through Margaret Mitchell’s magnificent
historical novel, Gone with the Wind.
GWTW, as many abbreviate it, is one
of my favorite novels, and I have plenty of company. According to a recent
Harris poll, GWTW is second only to the Bible in popularity among Americans.
And there are a lot of reasons for that: it’s a great story, an easily-digested
history lesson, and, for writers, it’s like a master class in storytelling.
First off, consider the storyline
and the clear, linear structure: it’s not just a story about a spoiled Southern
Belle, or the devastation of war, or the hardships of Reconstruction after the
Civil War, or a woman struggling to preserve her family’s legacy. It’s all that—and more.
GWTW carries a timeless theme. In
Margaret Mitchell’s own words, "If
the novel has a theme it is that of survival. What makes some people able to
come through catastrophes and others, apparently just as able, strong and
brave, go under? It happens in every upheaval. Some people survive; others
don't. What qualities are in those who fight their way through triumphantly
that are lacking in those who go under...? I only know that the survivors used
to call that quality 'gumption.' So I wrote about the people who had gumption
and the people who didn't."
And did she ever write about people
with gumption! Not only that, she created a cast of complex, fascinating
characters. When we first meet main character Scarlett O’Hara, we’re told right
off the bat that she’s not beautiful, but “men seldom realized it when caught
by her charm. . .” What a way to introduce a character! Scarlett is a study in
contradictions: she’s vain, foolish and selfish, but she’s also smart, strong
and brave.
Her counterpart, Rhett Butler,
comes on the scene as a scalawag, a scoundrel and a cynic. However, as we get
to know him, we learn he’s also an idealist, a romantic, and—who’d have guessed
it?—a patriot.
GWTW is also a superb history
lesson, and Ms. Mitchell delivers it in small, vivid bites, full of specific sensory
detail. Writers are advised to “show, don’t tell,” and Ms. Mitchell
demonstrates that repeatedly. Readers can almost feel the heat of the flames as
Atlanta burns and the clench of starvation that Scarlett endures. The details
feel authentic, and they probably are. Margaret Mitchell was born in 1900, and
her family lived in Atlanta. Her parents and grandparents probably witnessed
the Civil War firsthand and no doubt shared stories with young Margaret.
GWTW is also a spectacular model of
what a love story can be. It doesn’t just have a romantic triangle; it has trapezoids and rectangles all over the place, and
these are played out in a fascinating narrative.
GWTW is also the model for a modern
ending. Not every complication is resolved and tied up with a tidy little bow.
Ms. Mitchell left plenty of room for audience participation and interpretation.
Did Rhett really not “give a damn?” Will Scarlett get him back? Theories
abound.
The novel has a few flaws, of
course. The language and style seem out of sync with today’s writing, and some
of the dialogue is overblown and even clunky. When Sidney Howard wrote the
screenplay, he shortened that famous line I quoted at the start; he removed two
words, and Vivien Leigh vowed, “As God is my witness, I’ll never be hungry
again.” Much more punch in that one.
But none of this detracts from the
novel’s power to cast a spell. Almost 80 years later, people still care about
the book and its characters, and the ambiguous ending sparks many a spirited
discussion. What more could an author hope for?
What an excellent post, Bonnie. I never really thought about GWTW from the "writing a novel perspective," just as a book/movie I enjoyed. The characters, setting, and point in history are excellently done. Funny, on the language and style, I still kinda like some of the "old" stuff.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you, Mad. As a vintage model myself, I appreciate some of the "old stuff."
DeleteReally enjoyed this!!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Gay. BTW, I am REALLY enjoying your novel!
DeleteThat's an amazing topic to have discussed. I've never thought of the author writing this book or even everything it represents. Great post!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Jackie. Glad it resonated for you too.
DeleteYour post does show that there are levels in any well-written story. And frankly, in any life. That makes it far more interesting.
ReplyDeleteThanks, GB. It is pretty darn interesting.
DeleteGreat post!
ReplyDelete"Gone with the Wind" is my favorite (non mystery) novel of all time!
What great taste you have, Patricia!
DeleteI'm embarrassed to say I've never read GWTW. After reading this post, I believe I will. Thank you! (Saw the movie, of course.)
ReplyDeleteMarja McGraw
You're welcome, Marja! I've always thought they did a stellar job with the movie. The book is a real time commitment, but ever so worth it.
DeleteWell done, Bonnie. I do declare!
ReplyDeleteWell fiddle-dee-dee and thank you kindly, Alice!
DeleteGreat article, great writing!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Kay!
DeleteTo a modern reader the book can come off as racist. I found I had to remember when it was written to be able to get past that. But it's worth it to put yourself in that mindset and get the history lesson.
ReplyDeleteI've always thought Mitchell did an amazing job with this huge story. It all fits together so well that she must have outlined it, but you don't see her underpinnings. It's seamless.
It is pretty impressive, Petrea, especially concerning all the events she swept into the saga. And I also had to mentally put myself back in the 19th century in order to fully appreciate it.
DeleteI don't know about outlining or being organized. As one who constantly fights to keep my desk under control, I was comforted to hear that when a young man, interested in reading this yet unpublished novel, went to Mitchell's house, he found the hundreds of pages scattered all over the floor, on sofas, armchairs, under coffee cups, coffee stained and so on. It took him a long, long time to put all the pages in order before he could begin to read GWTW.
ReplyDeleteAnd aren't we glad he did, Rosemary!
DeleteWell, who'd have thunk? I've seen the movie of course but don't think I've ever read the book. Now I will, thanks to your prompting. Nice post.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Baxter. I hope you enjoy the novel as much as I do.
ReplyDeleteRead the book many times.
ReplyDeleteIt's one that can stand up to multiple readings for sure, Marilyn.
ReplyDelete