“Do
you use an outline when you write?”
Every
time I’ve gone to a writing seminar I hear this question, which puzzles me
because I don’t believe it’s what the asker really wants to know. What is really
being asked is if writers should use some system to structure their work,
whether it’s an outline, software, poster board with index cards, or any other method.
I asked several authors,
including my co-WinRs, if and how they organize their writing.
Madeline
Gornell doesn’t outline or use any formal system beyond a character list. “I
‘wing it,’ develop, build, and go back to fill in as I go.”
Andrea
Hurst, author of The Guestbook, Always With You, and the
soon-to-be-released Tea and Comfort
(in addition to several works of non-fiction), varies her approach with each
novel according to what she feels is needed.
“On my first book I knew the beginning and the end and did deep
character and setting work. On my second book I knew only the very beginning
and end and it just poured out. On my third and current book, I have outlined
in detail the scene points and overall plot ahead of time and it seems to work
well.”
Gayle
Bartos Pool favors some organizing techniques, but adapts them to each project.
“I have used an outline before and it worked fine, but I usually just write as
I go. I do maintain a timeline to keep the action straight and it keeps the
characters from bumping into each other unless I want them to do that. And I do
write biographies for my main characters.”
Bonnie
Schroeder works with ‘The Snowflake System’. Although she didn’t purchase the
software, she follows the general approach. “You start with the germ of an idea
and gradually flesh it out through several iterations, including detailed
chapter and character summaries. The most valuable thing I got from this was
the ‘Scene Spreadsheet’, which has really helped me see where everything
happens and where there’s no conflict, etc.” For more details, go to: www.advancedfictionwriting.com/articles/snowflake-method/
Rowena
Williamson juggles two historical fiction series – Castle Caorann and Ryan and
the Redhead – and is working on a sequel to her popular YA book, Escape To The Highlands. Despite her substantial
workload, Rowena doesn’t use any system. “I can’t really plot without getting
feedback from my characters.”
“I
outline my stories in my head and I always know where I’m going,” said Audrey
Mackaman, author of two YA fiction series, Murder
Most Magic and The Dream Cycle.
Jacqueline Vick always uses an outline. “With a mystery, there is too much backtracking to
clean up clues etc. without one. And it's too easy to go off on tangents and
get away from the plot.” She begins by taking notes and making up a style sheet
– a quick reference tool for things she always needs to look up. “It helps keep track of names, places,
grammar problems that pop up for me personally, hard to spell words, etc.”
Although this system has worked for her in the past, she is currently trying
out Scrivener software. “I'm going to give that a shot with the next mystery I
write. It's gotten good reviews!” For
more information about Scrivener, go to www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php
“I think it's very individual, this writing process,” said Heather Ames, whose
publications include the romantic suspense All That Glitters, contemporary romance The Sweetest Song and Indelible,
the first in her mystery/suspense series. She tried
using an outline to give her writing group an idea of where Swift Justice (the sequel to Indelible) was going, but the story
strayed in another direction. “I've never
used any of the writing programs. I'm a freewheeler.”
What
about me? I began writing my first novel with the idea of seeing if I could do
it. I had no plan or outline, just a character, an incident, and a vague sense
of the plot. I’m pleased with it now, but it took over a decade to finish. I’ve
often thought outlines would speed up the writing process and now begin each
book with a synopsis of the story, but I rarely stick to it. I rebel against
micromanagement, even self-imposed. My second novel took only four years to
complete, so I guess I’m getting faster.
From
this small sampling, it appears there is no consensus. Some writers deem
systems necessary to keep them on track. Others find them inhibiting; they
prefer to let the story flow. Many hybridize the process; they use timelines
and biographies to keep the details straight, or work with a beginning and an
end, and let their creative instincts fill in the rest. And a few do whatever
they find works best for a particular project. Maybe that’s what draws us to
writing stories that appeal to us. We prefer having the freedom to follow our
muse and only use organizational tools if we need help with our characters or
plotting. Or as Rowena Williamson put it, “I couldn’t hold to a book-a-year
schedule. My books would go downhill if I did that.”
Your post does show that writers do have a plan, even if it is different from the others. We all do something to keep us on track. And the more we write the better we are at keeping all the threads from coming loose.
ReplyDeleteYes, I was surprised to learn that I wasn't the only writer who adjusted my approach to writing over time.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting post, Miko! I loved hearing what other authors are doing. It's all so interesting how different we all are--and knowing that is a comfort, especially in those times you're asking yourself, am I doing this right! (I must add, my comment sounds rather flippant, but it's true, I do wing it. Though after I've "winged it" write down some consistency things like cars and guns the various characters use.)
ReplyDeleteAnyway, really enjoyed your post!
Madeline
I don't think your comment was flippant at all. I'm sure the other writers I interviewed who made similar comments would bear that out.
DeleteLove it. Much to think about as I continue to work on mine.
ReplyDeleteThat's what we hope to do with this blog. Glad to have inspired you.
DeleteLot of good and varied info here, Miko. I like to outline mine to death, but it takes so long, that sometimes all the momentum to actually write the novel has faded by the time I'm done. (Hence, my Sister Secrets women's fiction, which has languished in the drawer - or computer file - for years.) I think when people are asking that question - usually non-authors - they want to know HOW to write a book quickly and easily, thinking that someday a successful author will tell them the magic key and they will be able to do it too, instead of just sitting down with fingers on keyboard and pounding out the story. It's hard work no matter which way you use and some are simply not committed to do it. (Guess that's why I stick to short pieces!)
ReplyDeleteYou're right, there is no magic formula, but at least there are no hard fast rules, either. We can choose whatever method works for us. As you point out, the key is to keep at it and write.
DeleteGreat post! I've tried a few different ideas, but my characters always take the story in the direction they prefer. I follow along and hope for the best.
ReplyDeleteMarja McGraw
So do many of the writers I interviewed for this post, including me. While writing the second novel in my "Petal In The Wind" trilogy, two characters defied my attempts to keep them apart. Now the series will require four books to complete.
DeleteWriting two series, I already know the main characters, then it's a matter of what the story is going to be--who is going to be murdered (usually), why, and who might've done it. Things spin away from there.
ReplyDeleteYour approach is similar to other writers who have series with established characters, relationships, and locales. It provides a structure of sorts, don't you think?
DeleteI think you have a much more organized mind than I have!
DeleteMiko, this is a very thoughtful post. It I could write by the seat of my pants, I would but I need a guide. I use a couple of adapted screenwriting techniques that have worked for me. I do a rough three act outline with plot points before I start in. As many as I know at the beginning. For the latest installment in my Lovers and Liars gay historical romance, I've also written a ten page treatment that I hope to follow as much as I can. At least until the characters tell me what they will and won't do. That's the fun part. Amazing how differently writers approach the process. Great post. Paul
ReplyDeleteThanks, Paul. It shows there's no right or wrong way to write. Use whatever system works for you.
DeleteI used to have this fine fantasy of me sitting at my typewriter (this was a long time ago) tapping out the Great American Novel the first time around. When I actually tried it, I got about five pages into it and hit a wall. Now what? That's why a sort-of plan helps me along, but the trick is to not become a slave to your initial storyline. So interesting to read of others' techniques, Miko. Thanks for this well-researched post.
ReplyDeleteYou're right about flexibility being the key. Many writers like to adapt their storyline as they write, for often our first idea is not our best.
DeleteI find the structure of the outline actually helps me to be more creative. Once everything is there in the outline, if something arises organically, I have a better handle on the impact those changes will have throughout the story. It's kind of like making a clay pot on a wheel. I have to have the lump of clay there before I can start shaping it. :)
ReplyDeleteThat's the great thing about finding your own system - it doesn't matter what you do as long as it works for you. But I wonder if more structure is needed with certain genres, like mysteries. What do you think?
DeleteI have read a few mysteries where some of the loose ends were still loose when I finished the book. Keeping either an outline or time line might eliminate some of those oversights.
DeleteMy interviews with authors of all genres have shown that the more complicated the storyline, the greater the need for a system to keep everything in place. Mysteries and political thrillers as well as books with multiple story lines or an extensive cast of characters fall into that category. Haven't we all caught a cousin on page 12 turn into an uncle on page 97?
DeleteMiko Johnston - Best post I've read on this age-old debate. Oh, this is Terry K Carr. I am not anonymous, only here, where I couldn't figure out how to post the other way.
ReplyDeleteThanks Terry. It's a subject we writers always think about, which is what inspired me to write this post.
Delete